Historical materials and biomedical community evidence

Source vintage: 11 October 2026; pooled 2021–2025 work ledger and dated researcher cross-section. These are anonymous historical network aggregates. They have not been independently restated under the new work-affiliation policy and do not establish current availability, usable access, a delivery team, consent or completed work.

Balanced community

Two eligible balanced-community aggregate rows. Both meet the original criteria: at least three institutions with at least two mapped members, no institution above 75% of membership, and no researcher above 50% of cross-institution ties. Individual identities and tie lists are excluded.

The materials/biomedical row has 220 mapped researchers, 11 institutions (nine with at least two members), a largest-institution share of 0.286 and cross-tie dominance of 0.105. Its displayed subfields include Biomedical Engineering (31), Molecular Biology (20) and Materials Chemistry (18). Six institutions have at least five mapped members: UA Little Rock, UA Fayetteville, UA Pine Bluff, Central Arkansas, UAMS and Arkansas State. The source groups the remaining institutions without exposing their membership cells.

Separate connected-group cluster

Eligible connected-group cluster: the retained cluster has ten institution/subfield groups across Arkansas State, UA Fayetteville, UA Little Rock and UAMS. Its subfields include Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry. The source-defined shared-work link total is 55 across ten links. This is a different grouping from the 220-member community; the two populations are not added or treated as the same team.

Provenance

strengths/e-network-communities.csv, SHA-256 c5d583509b9e1826c1e05ab116ab69bcb93555282edeeb67e3986bd324f5a7a5; selector balanced_multi_inst=True, at least three institutions with at least two members.

strengths/e-network-team-clusters.csv, SHA-256 d6f3e8815fb525867c4d42ace9b35990f3f4c4745c4245cf42df41ef5c0f8774; selector publishable_rule3=True and n_institutions>=3.

The cluster and community descriptors support a historical materials/biomedical connection. Hosts still need to verify a proposed project's people, tasks, responsibilities, access and handover arrangements. No individual researcher records are published.