Area evidence cards, proposed test briefs and partner discussion materials

Seven evidence cards

Download the seven cards (PDF) or read them individually: health, power, transport, materials, precision agriculture, food, and supply chains and retail.

The review checks the abstracts and first independent claims of 21 primary patent documents. For each area, the review took two examples that test the scope and boundary of the area, plus one narrow-match candidate chosen by a fixed, deterministic hash selection.

This is a bounded analytical review. It is not a statistical estimate of accuracy, an external expert sign-off or a legal opinion. The broad and narrow counts, and the counts by current and issue-time classification, are screening observations and are not validated area totals.

The examples show that agricultural varieties and generic business software can be included too broadly, while soil sensing and a functional polymer can be missed by narrow classification prefixes. The seven strategic areas are unchanged by the review.

Two proposed tests

Download the two one-page briefs (PDF) or read the briefs.

The food-process brief asks whether a change defined by the processor improves results against a fixed batch specification, using the same assay and sampling rules. Invalid or missing tests, eligible batches left untested, product mix and throughput must all be reported.

The supply-chain brief first compares forecasts fixed in advance on identical held-out records. The weighted absolute percentage error (WAPE) describes observed sales error and is undefined when the sales in the denominator are all zero. A prospective ordering trial would be a separate decision.

Neither brief supplies a measured baseline, a numeric target, an accepted owner, a budget or a start date.

Partner discussion

Food-process packet (PDF) · Supply-chain packet (PDF) · Reply sheets (PDF) · Data-request checklist (CSV)

The packets are discussion materials. They do not reflect any partner response or data-access arrangement.

The reply sheets ask for the problem, the decision owner, the records and any restrictions on them, a comparator, a success threshold, safeguards, host capacity, costs and accepted responsibilities. A proposed test moves into the project register only once an answer and its supporting evidence are recorded.

Official food-innovation services and the supply-chain center are possible routes for discussion. Their public descriptions were checked on 27 October 2026. Those descriptions do not confirm staff time, service suitability, data access, fees or willingness to take part in these tests.

Sources and scope

The original public-data snapshots used for this review are preserved. The packets keep the operating-measure definitions used earlier, and they contain no observed results or partner-accepted commitments.

Individual inventor records, raw downloaded web pages, contact details and credentials are excluded from these published materials. The materials provide a route for obtaining operating evidence. They do not show that any proposed project already works.